Re: uspend to Disk - Kernel 2.6.4 vs. r50p

[Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>]

On Thursday 06 May 2004 10:43, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 08:18:23PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > I'm one of the people for whom Patrick's suspend worked and yours didn't.
> >  Now I've been busy with other things for a couple months (Penguicon 2.0
> > went quite well, by the way), and there's talk of yanking Patrick's
> > suspend code from the kernel.  Right, so I've got to deal with this.  I
> > can't say I'm thrilled, but I DO want to continue to be able to suspend
> > my laptop.
>
> Hi!
>     Just a couple of lines to tell you that I was convinced of the same (PM
>     works, SWSUSP-vanilla no). But from 2.6.3 --- to which I am stuck, had
>     no time to play, just to work, with my laptop till then --- swsusp
> works quite well (modulo pcmcia modem sometime getting stuck after resume
> and sometime no, misteries of life). Pavel told me that if PMDISK worked,
> SWSUSP (vanilla) should work, too, and he was right (tm).
>
>     The other way around is trying suspend2, given that Nigel is very
>     responsive; it will be the first thing I'll try again when having a
>     little time after IMTC04. It didn't work one month ago, but Nigel
> thinks he have fixed it.
>
>     By the way, I have a vaio FX701.

Thinkpad iSeries of some kind here.  It didn't work in 2.6.5, but I'll give 
2.6.6 a try and report back then...

The last one I _know_ worked was 2.6.2, but then I skipped 3 and 4.  Too 
busy...

I'm happy to debug problems with stuff I actually use, modulo the whole "too 
busy" thing...

Rob