From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261186AbUEFQ2f (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2004 12:28:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261169AbUEFQ2e (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2004 12:28:34 -0400 Received: from dsl092-053-140.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.53.140]:55944 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261186AbUEFQ2b (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2004 12:28:31 -0400 From: Rob Landley To: romano@dea.icai.upco.es Subject: Re: uspend to Disk - Kernel 2.6.4 vs. r50p Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 11:22:48 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040429064115.9A8E814D@damned.travellingkiwi.com> <200405042018.23043.rob@landley.net> <20040506154328.GA6245@pern.dea.icai.upco.es> In-Reply-To: <20040506154328.GA6245@pern.dea.icai.upco.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200405061122.48644.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 06 May 2004 10:43, Romano Giannetti wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 08:18:23PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > I'm one of the people for whom Patrick's suspend worked and yours didn't. > > Now I've been busy with other things for a couple months (Penguicon 2.0 > > went quite well, by the way), and there's talk of yanking Patrick's > > suspend code from the kernel. Right, so I've got to deal with this. I > > can't say I'm thrilled, but I DO want to continue to be able to suspend > > my laptop. > > Hi! > Just a couple of lines to tell you that I was convinced of the same (PM > works, SWSUSP-vanilla no). But from 2.6.3 --- to which I am stuck, had > no time to play, just to work, with my laptop till then --- swsusp > works quite well (modulo pcmcia modem sometime getting stuck after resume > and sometime no, misteries of life). Pavel told me that if PMDISK worked, > SWSUSP (vanilla) should work, too, and he was right (tm). > > The other way around is trying suspend2, given that Nigel is very > responsive; it will be the first thing I'll try again when having a > little time after IMTC04. It didn't work one month ago, but Nigel > thinks he have fixed it. > > By the way, I have a vaio FX701. Thinkpad iSeries of some kind here. It didn't work in 2.6.5, but I'll give 2.6.6 a try and report back then... The last one I _know_ worked was 2.6.2, but then I skipped 3 and 4. Too busy... I'm happy to debug problems with stuff I actually use, modulo the whole "too busy" thing... Rob