Re: 2.4.27-pre2: tg3: there's no WARN_ON in 2.4

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>]

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:44:06AM +1000, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> >On Tuesday 04 May 2004 22:46, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> >Hi Adrian,
> >
> >
> >>drivers/net/net.o(.text+0x60293): In function `tg3_get_strings':
> >>: undefined reference to `WARN_ON'
> >>make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
> >>There's no WARN_ON in 2.4.
> >
> >
> >yep. Either we backport WARN_ON ;) or simply do the attached.
> >
> >--- old/drivers/net/tg3.c	2004-05-04 14:30:22.000000000 +0200
> >+++ new/drivers/net/tg3.c	2004-05-04 14:49:58.000000000 +0200
> >@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
> > #define TG3_TSO_SUPPORT	0
> > #endif
> > 
> >+#ifndef WARN_ON
> >+#define	WARN_ON(x)	do { } while (0)
> >+#endif
> 
> Related but off topic. Do people find the ab#define	WARN_ON(x)
> a macro acceptable? The fact is that not mentioning 'x' means any
> side-effects are not executed, meaning the author must take special
> care when using this macro.
>...

Do not use code with side effects in BUG_ON and WARN_ON.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed