From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: stefan.eletzhofer@eletztrick.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 I2C re-add i2c_get_client()
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 15:30:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040507223027.GE14660@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040502150815.GA32603@gonzo.local>
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 05:08:15PM +0200, stefan.eletzhofer@eletztrick.de wrote:
> On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 11:01:09PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 04:06:57PM +0200, stefan.eletzhofer@eletztrick.de wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > here's a patch which re-adds i2c_get_client() back to i2c_core.c.
> > > That call was removed in 2003 because there were no users of that
> > > function at that time.
> > >
> > > I think this call is needed for I2C chip drivers which provide functionality to
> > > be used by other driver modules, for example RTC chips or EEPROMs. These chip
> > > drivers tend to encapsulate raw i2c chip access and provide function calls
> > > for other modulesi, for example via the i2c_driver->command() method.
> > >
> > > I tried to get the locking right, so please comment. The patch is
> > > against 2.6.6-rc3 and works quite fine with my i2c rtc chip.
> >
> > Locking looks correct, but you also need to increment either the
> > device's reference count, and/or the module reference count for the
> > client.
>
> I thought that would be the purpose of i2c_use_client(), like the comment
> in linux/i2c.h suggests? That call also takes care of the ALLOW_USE flag.
Yes, but your new function doesn't call it, right? What happens if the
driver goes away between the get_client call and the use_client call?
oops...
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-08 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-29 14:06 [PATCH] 2.6 I2C re-add i2c_get_client() stefan.eletzhofer
2004-05-02 6:01 ` Greg KH
2004-05-02 15:08 ` stefan.eletzhofer
2004-05-07 22:30 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040507223027.GE14660@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.eletzhofer@eletztrick.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox