From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264846AbUEJQKS (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2004 12:10:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264847AbUEJQKR (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2004 12:10:17 -0400 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.172.17]:20613 "EHLO nevyn.them.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264846AbUEJQKN (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2004 12:10:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 12:10:08 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Fabiano Ramos Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: ptrace in 2.6.5 Message-ID: <20040510161008.GA11114@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Fabiano Ramos , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <1084203979.1421.1.camel@slack.domain.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1084203979.1421.1.camel@slack.domain.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:46:19PM -0300, Fabiano Ramos wrote: > Hi All. > > Is ptrace(), in singlestep mode, required to stop after a int 0x80? > When tracing a sequence like > > mov ... > int 0x80 > mov .... > > ptrace would notify the tracer after the two movs, but not after the > int 0x80. I want to know if it is a bug or the expected behaviour. I think it's a bug. -- Daniel Jacobowitz