From: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
manfred@colorfullife.com, torvalds@osdl.org, davej@redhat.com,
wli@holomorphy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dentry bloat.
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:56:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040511105658.F31521@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040509152720.039f759a.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Sun, May 09, 2004 at 03:27:20PM -0700
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 03:27:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:03:16PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> >
> > > Actually, what may happen is that since the dentries are added
> > > in the front, a double move like that would result in hash chain
> > > traversal looping. Timing dependent and unlikely, but d_move_count
> > > avoided that theoritical possibility. It is not about skipping
> > > dentries which is safe because a miss would result in a real_lookup()
> >
> > Not really. A miss could result in getting another dentry allocated
> > for the same e.g. directory, which is *NOT* harmless at all.
>
> The d_bucket logic does look a bit odd.
>
> dentry = hlist_entry(node, struct dentry, d_hash);
>
> /* if lookup ends up in a different bucket
> * due to concurrent rename, fail it
> */
> if (unlikely(dentry->d_bucket != head))
> break;
>
> /*
> * We must take a snapshot of d_move_count followed by
> * read memory barrier before any search key comparison
> */
> move_count = dentry->d_move_count;
>
> There is a window between the d_bucket test and sampling of d_move_count.
> What happens if the dentry gets moved around in there?
>
> Anyway, regardless of that, it is more efficient to test d_bucket _after_
> performing the hash comparison. And it seems saner to perform the d_bucket
> check when things are pinned down by d_lock.
>
This should be fine. Earlier d_bucket check was done before "continue" as the
lookup used to loop infinetly. The reason for infinite looping was that lookup
going to a different hash bucket due to concurrent d_move and not finding
the list head from where it started.
After introduction of hlist, there is less chance of lookup looping
infinitely even if it is moved to a different hash bucket as hlist ends with
NULL.
But I still see theoritical possibilty of increased looping. Double rename can
keep putting lookup back at the head of hash chain and hlist end is never seen.
--
Maneesh Soni
IBM Linux Technology Center,
IBM India Software Lab, Bangalore.
Phone: +91-80-5044999 email: maneesh@in.ibm.com
http://lse.sourceforge.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-11 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040506200027.GC26679@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20040506150944.126bb409.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <409B1511.6010500@colorfullife.com>
2004-05-08 8:23 ` dentry bloat Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 9:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:28 ` viro
2004-05-08 10:41 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:52 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:31 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-05-08 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 18:19 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-08 19:01 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 20:42 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-08 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 21:19 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-09 0:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-09 2:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 3:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-09 3:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 21:03 ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-10 8:27 ` Helge Hafting
2004-05-10 8:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-10 9:46 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-10 14:54 ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-10 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-05-10 18:34 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-09 4:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-09 4:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 4:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-09 5:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 7:36 ` Rodolfo Guluarte Hale
2004-05-09 9:10 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-05-09 9:23 ` viro
2004-05-09 15:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 18:11 ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-09 22:08 ` Francois Romieu
2004-05-09 23:51 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-10 7:17 ` Florian Weimer
2004-05-10 14:12 ` Rik van Riel
2004-05-09 4:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 7:28 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-05-09 15:33 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-09 22:17 ` viro
2004-05-09 22:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-11 5:26 ` Maneesh Soni [this message]
2004-05-10 18:39 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-11 5:17 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-05-08 20:13 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-10-06 12:58 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-05-11 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-14 10:33 ` Raghavan
2004-05-14 10:50 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-14 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-14 11:14 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-14 11:24 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-14 11:30 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-14 11:24 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-14 11:18 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-14 14:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 21:00 ` Dipankar Sarma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040511105658.F31521@in.ibm.com \
--to=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox