From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Fabiano Ramos <ramos_fabiano@yahoo.com.br>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ptrace in 2.6.5
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:07:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040511140722.GA13568@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405102340260.1156@bigblue.dev.mdolabs.com>
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:41:53PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 May 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > > On the kernel side, this would be pretty much solved by issuing a ptrace
> > > op, with a modified EIP (+2) on return from a syscall (if in single-step
> > > mode).
> >
> > Actaully, the EIP should not be changed (since it already points to the
> > intruction following INT 0x80) and I believe it is sufficent to replace
> > the test for _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE with (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | TIF_SINGLESTEP)
> > in the system call return path. This should generate a ptrace trap with
> > EIP pointing to the next instruction following INT 0x80.
>
> The patch below (for i386) should work.
Yeah, that's what I was suggesting. I think the patch is right.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-11 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1UlcA-6lq-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-05-10 18:49 ` ptrace in 2.6.5 Andi Kleen
2004-05-10 19:37 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-10 20:24 ` Fabiano Ramos
2004-05-10 21:49 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-05-10 22:47 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-05-10 22:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-10 23:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-11 0:40 ` Fabiano Ramos
2004-05-11 6:14 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-11 6:27 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-11 6:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-11 14:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-05-10 15:46 Fabiano Ramos
2004-05-10 16:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-10 16:22 ` Fabiano Ramos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040511140722.GA13568@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ramos_fabiano@yahoo.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox