From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265090AbUELAPh (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 20:15:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263173AbUELAP2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 20:15:28 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:59065 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265090AbUELAPI (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 20:15:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 17:17:40 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Fabiano Ramos Cc: davidel@xmailserver.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] really-ptrace-single-step Message-Id: <20040511171740.6aa32cd1.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1084296680.2912.8.camel@slack.domain.invalid> References: <1084296680.2912.8.camel@slack.domain.invalid> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fabiano Ramos wrote: > > Still not getting the desired result. > Which kernel is the patch based on? > > On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 14:12, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > This patch lets a ptrace process on x86 to "see" the instruction > > following the INT #80h op. Please. Don't edit people out of email headers. Just do reply-to-all. I didn't see your "it doesn't work" email for many hours after having merged the patch. Thanks.