From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264885AbUELBWG (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 21:22:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264155AbUELBJN (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 21:09:13 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:2273 "EHLO fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264916AbUELBH5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 21:07:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:06:56 -0700 From: Matt Porter To: Andrew Morton Cc: Matt Porter , benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PPC32: New OCP core support Message-ID: <20040511180656.B4901@home.com> References: <20040511170150.A4743@home.com> <20040511175750.12bad316.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20040511175750.12bad316.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:57:50PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:57:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Matt Porter wrote: > > > > New OCP infrastructure ported from 2.4 along with several > > enhancements. Please apply. > > I only received patch 1/2. > > Could you please avoid using the same Subject: for different patches? It > confuses my auto-subject-to-patch-filename-munger and it's nice to more > specifically identify each patch anwyay. Oddly I sent unique subjects: Subject: [PATCH 1/2] PPC32: New OCP core support Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PPC32: PPC4xx updates for new OCP It appears 2/2 at least made it off my system to the remote mailer, will doublecheck. -Matt