From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263640AbUEKUqq (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 16:46:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263628AbUEKUqp (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 16:46:45 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:23951 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263645AbUEKUqX (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 16:46:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 13:44:16 -0700 From: Greg KH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com Cc: Michael Hunold Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] Rename hardware monitoring I2C class Message-ID: <20040511204415.GA23991@kroah.com> References: <409923F7.7050101@convergence.de> <20040506213455.29154c51.khali@linux-fr.org> <20040509174820.5bc47686.khali@linux-fr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040509174820.5bc47686.khali@linux-fr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 05:48:20PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Greg, all, > > Quoting myself: > > > Mmm, I once proposed that I2C_ADAP_CLASS_SMBUS would be better renamed > > I2C_ADAP_CLASS_SENSORS (so I2C_CLASS_SENSORS now). What about that? I > > think it would be great to embed that change into your patch, so that > > the name changes only once. > > > > BTW, if HWMON is prefered to SENSORS, this is fine with me too, I > > have no strong preference. > > Below is a patch that does that. I finally went for HWMON. Yes, it's > big, but it's actually nothing more than > s/I2C_CLASS_SMBUS/I2C_CLASS_HWMON/ (thanks perl -wip :)). > > Greg, can you please apply it on top of Michael's patch? Applied, thanks. greg k-h