public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PPC32: New OCP core support
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 06:32:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040512063236.C8797@home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001c437cd$52469fc0$d100000a@sbs2003.local>; from Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu on Wed, May 12, 2004 at 04:00:46AM +0100

On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 04:00:46AM +0100, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:01:44 PDT, Matt Porter said:
> 
> > Actually, OCP stands for On-Chip Peripheral and is the basic system
> > we've used in ppc32 for some time now to abstract dumb peripherals
> > behind a standard API. BenH did yet another rewrite of OCP in 2.4
> > sometime ago and I picked up that work to port to 2.6 and the new
> > device model. It is a software abstraction, and easily allows us to
> > plug in SoC descriptors when new chips come out and use standard apis
> > to modify device entries on a per-board basis during "setup_arch()
> > time". It used to be PPC4xx-specific, but now is being used by
> > PPC85xx, MV64xxx, and MPC52xx based PPC systems. "Now", meaning that
> > the respective developers for those parts are using the OCP working
> > tree to base their 2.6 ports off of.
> 
> Wrap a /* */ around that paragraph and add it to the top of ppc/syslib/ocp.c :)

I incorporated a more polished version into the updated patch I just
sent.

Thanks.

-Matt

  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-12 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-12  0:01 [PATCH 1/2] PPC32: New OCP core support Matt Porter
2004-05-12  0:39 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12  1:01   ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12  1:10     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12  3:00     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 13:32       ` Matt Porter [this message]
2004-05-12  3:15     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12  1:45   ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12  2:00   ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12  0:57 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12  1:06   ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12  1:45   ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12  2:38     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-12  3:15     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-12  1:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12  3:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12  3:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12  5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-12  6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-12 13:39   ` Matt Porter
2004-05-12  6:30 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040512063236.C8797@home.com \
    --to=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox