* Preempted by idle thread?
@ 2004-05-12 2:23 Nigel Cunningham
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nigel Cunningham @ 2004-05-12 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Mailing List
Hi all.
I've been seeing some funny bad_scheduling_while_atomic messages that might be
my own fault (they only occur after suspending). The funny thing, though, is
that they are all the same, and show a calling chain:
schedule_tail -> preempt_schedule -> cpu_idle
Am I misunderstanding this, or is a thread being preempted by cpu_idle? If
that is the case, real work shouldn't be preempted to idle, should it?
Nigel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-05-12 2:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-12 2:23 Preempted by idle thread? Nigel Cunningham
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).