From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265192AbUENLFP (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2004 07:05:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264444AbUENLFP (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2004 07:05:15 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:50383 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265250AbUENLFF (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2004 07:05:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:04:29 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Paul Jackson Cc: raghav@in.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, maneesh@in.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, torvalds@osdl.org, manfred@colorfullife.com, davej@redhat.com, wli@holomorphy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dentry bloat. Message-ID: <20040514110427.GG17326@suse.de> References: <20040508022304.17779635.akpm@osdl.org> <20040508031159.782d6a46.akpm@osdl.org> <20040508120148.1be96d66.akpm@osdl.org> <20040508201259.GA6383@in.ibm.com> <20041006125824.GE2004@in.ibm.com> <20040511132205.4b55292a.akpm@osdl.org> <20040514103322.GA6474@in.ibm.com> <20040514035039.347871e8.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040514035039.347871e8.pj@sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 14 2004, Paul Jackson wrote: > > Looks like the new hashing function has brought down the performance. > > "brought down the performance" as in "better, faster", right? > > That is, your numbers show that the new hashing function is good, right? > > Or do I have it backwards? The numbers were ms/iteration, so I guess you do. -- Jens Axboe