From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Marc Singer <elf@buici.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: arm-lh7a40x IDE support in 2.6.6
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 20:52:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040514205212.A19539@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405142045.51875.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>; from B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl on Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:45:51PM +0200
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:45:51PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 14 of May 2004 19:26, Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:40:04PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > I was just porting my patches killing <asm/arch/ide.h> for
> > > ARM to 2.6.6 when noticed that more work is needed now. :-(
> > >
> > > arch/arm/mach-lh7a40x/ide-lpd7a40x.c
> > > include/asm-arm/arch-lh7a40x/ide.h
> > >
> > > Why it couldn't be done in drivers/ide/arm
> > > (as discussed on linux-ide)?
> >
> > Your response took look enough for me to switch to another job. I
> > haven't yet returned to dealing with this.
>
> Yes, it took too long.
>
> Anyway, pushing non-working code to mainline is a bad thing
> (I can show some proofs for this statement).
It was a necessary step. To get around this, we're going to ask people
to submit new machine support on a file by file basis, and that's just
not practical, and you can't expect me to be able to track _every_
_single_ fscking change to the kernel, and pick up every one in a
review.
There will always be a delay between changes happening between two people
and we have to live with it. Not everyone works on Linus' latest kernel.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-14 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-14 16:40 arm-lh7a40x IDE support in 2.6.6 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-05-14 16:52 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-05-14 17:28 ` Marc Singer
2004-05-14 17:26 ` Marc Singer
2004-05-14 18:45 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-05-14 19:47 ` Marc Singer
2004-05-14 21:23 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-05-14 21:33 ` Marc Singer
2004-05-14 22:19 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-05-14 22:49 ` Marc Singer
2004-05-14 23:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-05-15 0:10 ` Marc Singer
2004-05-15 0:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-05-15 0:33 ` Marc Singer
2004-05-14 19:52 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-05-14 20:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040514205212.A19539@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=elf@buici.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox