Re: 1352 NUL bytes at the end of a page? (was Re: Assertion `s && s->tree' failed: The saga continues.)

Rutger Nijlunsing
2004-05-16T17:48:30Z

> > An easy way to verify for Steven is to give a quick spin to 2.6.5-aa5
> > and see if it's slow too, that will rule out the anon-vma changes
> > (for completeness: there's a minor race in 2.6.5-aa5 fixed in my current
> > internal tree, I posted the fix to l-k separately, but you can ignore
> > the fix for a simple test, it takes weeks to trigger anyways and you
> > need threads to trigger it and I've never seen threaded version control
> > systems so I doubt BK is threaded).
>
> I'm getting the linux-2.6.5.tar.bz2 file (already got 2.6.5-aa2) via ppp,
> while running the bk test script on 2.6.6-current and no PREEMPT.
> That takes a while on 56k dialup. I'll leave all that running while
> I go hiking.

ketchup should get you faster to 2.6.5 vanilla...

--
Rutger Nijlunsing ---------------------------- rutger ed tux tmfweb nl
never attribute to a conspiracy which can be explained by incompetence
----------------------------------------------------------------------