From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262927AbUEQWMY (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 18:12:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262538AbUEQWMY (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 18:12:24 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:7584 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262909AbUEQWLe (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 18:11:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 15:14:12 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, james.bottomley@steeleye.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] init. mca_bus_type even if !MCA_bus Message-Id: <20040517151412.1f7fb7d4.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040517144603.1c63895f.rddunlap@osdl.org> References: <20040517144603.1c63895f.rddunlap@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Randy.Dunlap" wrote: > > - if(mca_system_init()) { > + if (mca_system_init()) { > printk(KERN_ERR "MCA bus system initialisation failed\n"); > return -ENODEV; > } > > + if (!MCA_bus) > + return -ENODEV; Why is it appropriate to register the MCA bus type when there is no MCA bus present?