From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263001AbUEQWoM (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 18:44:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263019AbUEQWoM (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 18:44:12 -0400 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:14471 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263001AbUEQWj5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2004 18:39:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 15:39:37 -0700 From: Richard Henderson To: Ivan Kokshaysky Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: alpha fp-emu vs module refcounting Message-ID: <20040517223937.GA22256@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ivan Kokshaysky , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040507110217.GA11366@lst.de> <20040507183208.A3283@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20040507143512.GA14338@lst.de> <20040508023717.A3960@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20040507224104.GA21153@lst.de> <20040508025142.A4330@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20040516100435.GD16301@infradead.org> <20040516164420.A950@den.park.msu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040516164420.A950@den.park.msu.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 04:44:20PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > Yet another simple solution would be just to remove refcounting and > only allow modular build of math-emu when CONFIG_SMP=n, which is > safe vs module unload and still fine for debugging. > > Richard? Seems reasonable. We've already got it under the debugging config section, right? r~