From: Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6.6] eepro100 vs e100?
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 08:58:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405190858.44632.lkml@kcore.org> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello List,
I'm currently in the process of cleaning up my 2.6 kernel configuration on my
trusty SMP HP Netserver LC3, which comes shipped with 2 identical intel Pro
Ethernet 100 mbit cards:
0000:00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100]
(rev 05)
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company NetServer 10/100TX
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 66, IRQ 16
Memory at fecfd000 (32-bit, prefetchable)
I/O ports at fcc0 [size=32]
Memory at fed00000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1
I'm wondering what driver is the "best" one to use? Judging by the comments in
the files, the e100 driver seems to be the best maintained, though I'm
probably wrong ;p
The website that is referenced in the eepro100 driver is no longer available
(returns a 404).
If someone can shed some light on this, thanks!
Jan
- --
Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind.
-- Mark Harrold
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAqwWhUQQOfidJUwQRAt7wAJ9H/wapw68XfrYHgV44tf4MfqIUeACdFBvF
R4Aupx+q9AlCKEWjtAE2v2c=
=jQHj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2004-05-19 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-19 6:58 Jan De Luyck [this message]
2004-05-19 7:11 ` [2.6.6] eepro100 vs e100? Danny ter Haar
2004-05-19 11:12 ` Meelis Roos
2004-05-19 11:19 ` J. Ryan Earl
2004-05-19 15:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-05-19 22:48 ` Darren Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200405190858.44632.lkml@kcore.org \
--to=lkml@kcore.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox