Re: bk-3.2.0 released

[Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>]

On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 04:11:15PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-05-19 07:02:59 -0700, Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
> wrote in message <20040519140259.GA18977@work.bitmover.com>:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:51:28AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:32:38PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> 
> > > > BK/Pro 3.2.0 has been released and is in the BK download area,
> > > And what makes this relevant for lkml?  I'm happy BK user, but this just
> > > seems to be compltely offtopic here..
> > 
> > It would be nice if you suggested a better approach, I'm at a loss as to
> > how to keep everyone happy.
> 
> Just create a bk-announce mailing list... News for those that want to
> read them, and even an archive of bk's timeline.

There is one, it was copied on the mail, but lots of people who use BK
for the kernel aren't on it.

I don't see the problem.  What's the big deal about a post that says a
new version of a widely used tool is available?  If someone posted that
there is a new version of gcc available is that off topic?  
-- 
---
Larry McVoy                lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitkeeper.com