* bk repository @ 2004-05-20 4:01 Davidlohr Bueso A 2004-05-20 7:39 ` Sam Ravnborg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Davidlohr Bueso A @ 2004-05-20 4:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel When will the 2.6 branch be added to the bitkeeper resository? dave ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bk repository 2004-05-20 4:01 bk repository Davidlohr Bueso A @ 2004-05-20 7:39 ` Sam Ravnborg 2004-05-20 15:25 ` Larry McVoy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2004-05-20 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Davidlohr Bueso A; +Cc: linux-kernel, Larry McVoy, ' On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:01:02AM -0400, Davidlohr Bueso A wrote: > When will the 2.6 branch be added to the bitkeeper resository? It's alrweady there, but with a bit mis-leading name. bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 To see the repository in your browser use: http://linux.bkbits.net and select the linux-2.5 repository. The reason to keep the linux-2.5 name is simply that renaming the repository would cause parent information to be void for all people pulling from this directory. To my knowledge there is no possibility to symlink two repositories, so both names could live in parrallel for a while?? Sam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bk repository 2004-05-20 7:39 ` Sam Ravnborg @ 2004-05-20 15:25 ` Larry McVoy 2004-05-20 18:04 ` Sam Ravnborg 2004-05-20 23:54 ` Ryan Anderson 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Larry McVoy @ 2004-05-20 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Davidlohr Bueso A, linux-kernel, ' On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 09:39:51AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:01:02AM -0400, Davidlohr Bueso A wrote: > > When will the 2.6 branch be added to the bitkeeper resository? > It's alrweady there, but with a bit mis-leading name. > bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 > > To see the repository in your browser use: > http://linux.bkbits.net and select the linux-2.5 repository. > > The reason to keep the linux-2.5 name is simply that renaming the repository > would cause parent information to be void for all people pulling > from this directory. > > To my knowledge there is no possibility to symlink two repositories, so > both names could live in parrallel for a while?? Sure there is and it's done. root@hostme:/repos/l/linux# ls -l total 20 drwxrwxr-x 17 linux 1000 4096 May 20 05:29 linux-2.4 drwxrwxr-x 20 linux 1000 4096 May 20 07:27 linux-2.5 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 May 20 08:24 linux-2.6 -> linux-2.5 drwxrwxr-x 20 root root 4096 May 10 17:40 lm drwxrwxr-x 16 linux root 4096 Apr 16 23:43 vger drwxrwxr-x 5 linux.ad 1000 4096 Mar 28 2002 www -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bk repository 2004-05-20 15:25 ` Larry McVoy @ 2004-05-20 18:04 ` Sam Ravnborg 2004-05-20 23:54 ` Ryan Anderson 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2004-05-20 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry McVoy, Davidlohr Bueso A, linux-kernel On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:25:43AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > To my knowledge there is no possibility to symlink two repositories, so > > both names could live in parrallel for a while?? > > Sure there is and it's done. Thanks! Can you make it visible at http://linux.bkbits.net - or I just have to be patient until a new page is generated? Sam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bk repository 2004-05-20 15:25 ` Larry McVoy 2004-05-20 18:04 ` Sam Ravnborg @ 2004-05-20 23:54 ` Ryan Anderson 2004-05-21 2:14 ` Randy.Dunlap 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Ryan Anderson @ 2004-05-20 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Larry McVoy, Davidlohr Bueso A, linux-kernel, ' On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:25:43AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 09:39:51AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:01:02AM -0400, Davidlohr Bueso A wrote: > > > When will the 2.6 branch be added to the bitkeeper resository? > > It's alrweady there, but with a bit mis-leading name. > > bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 [...] > > To my knowledge there is no possibility to symlink two repositories, so > > both names could live in parrallel for a while?? > > Sure there is and it's done. > > root@hostme:/repos/l/linux# ls -l > total 20 > drwxrwxr-x 17 linux 1000 4096 May 20 05:29 linux-2.4 > drwxrwxr-x 20 linux 1000 4096 May 20 07:27 linux-2.5 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 May 20 08:24 linux-2.6 -> linux-2.5 > drwxrwxr-x 20 root root 4096 May 10 17:40 lm > drwxrwxr-x 16 linux root 4096 Apr 16 23:43 vger > drwxrwxr-x 5 linux.ad 1000 4096 Mar 28 2002 www Wouldn't it make sense to avoid the need to do this in the future? Specifically, make a tree named "linux" available - that's always the Linus tree. Create linux-2.6/2.8/3.0/3.2 etc as they are handed off to maintainers *other* than Linus? Or some combination that makes sense. It just seems weird to me to need to continually change the name of the main development tree. -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bk repository 2004-05-20 23:54 ` Ryan Anderson @ 2004-05-21 2:14 ` Randy.Dunlap 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Randy.Dunlap @ 2004-05-21 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ryan Anderson; +Cc: lm, dbueso, linux-kernel, ' On Thu, 20 May 2004 19:54:38 -0400 Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com> wrote: | On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:25:43AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: | > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 09:39:51AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: | > > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:01:02AM -0400, Davidlohr Bueso A wrote: | > > > When will the 2.6 branch be added to the bitkeeper resository? | > > It's alrweady there, but with a bit mis-leading name. | > > bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 | | [...] | | > > To my knowledge there is no possibility to symlink two repositories, so | > > both names could live in parrallel for a while?? | > | > Sure there is and it's done. | > | > root@hostme:/repos/l/linux# ls -l | > total 20 | > drwxrwxr-x 17 linux 1000 4096 May 20 05:29 linux-2.4 | > drwxrwxr-x 20 linux 1000 4096 May 20 07:27 linux-2.5 | > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 May 20 08:24 linux-2.6 -> linux-2.5 | > drwxrwxr-x 20 root root 4096 May 10 17:40 lm | > drwxrwxr-x 16 linux root 4096 Apr 16 23:43 vger | > drwxrwxr-x 5 linux.ad 1000 4096 Mar 28 2002 www | | Wouldn't it make sense to avoid the need to do this in the future? | | Specifically, make a tree named "linux" available - that's always the | Linus tree. | | Create linux-2.6/2.8/3.0/3.2 etc as they are handed off to maintainers | *other* than Linus? | | Or some combination that makes sense. It just seems weird to me to need | to continually change the name of the main development tree. Continually, as in every 2-3 years? I don't see much of a problem here unless the cycle length changes. -- ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-21 22:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-05-20 4:01 bk repository Davidlohr Bueso A 2004-05-20 7:39 ` Sam Ravnborg 2004-05-20 15:25 ` Larry McVoy 2004-05-20 18:04 ` Sam Ravnborg 2004-05-20 23:54 ` Ryan Anderson 2004-05-21 2:14 ` Randy.Dunlap
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox