From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: FabF <Fabian.Frederick@skynet.be>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.6-mm4-ff1] I/O context isolation
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:53:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040521075342.GP1952@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1085125564.8071.23.camel@bluerhyme.real3>
On Fri, May 21 2004, FabF wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 09:38, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > FabF wrote:
> > > Jens,
> > >
> > > Here's ff1 patchset to have generic I/O context.
> > > ff1 : Export io context operations from blkdev/ll_rw_blk (ok)
> > > ff2 : Make io_context generic plateform by importing IO stuff from
> > > as_io.
> > >
> >
> > Can I just ask why you want as_io_context in generic code?
> > It is currently nicely hidden away in as-iosched.c where
> > nobody else needs to ever see it.
> I do want I/O context to be generic not the whole as_io.
> That export should bring:
> -All elevators to use io_context
For?
> -source tree to be more self-explanatory
> -have a stronger elevator interface
Those aren't real arguments :-)
> > > AFAICS, cfq_queue for instance could disappear when using io_context
> > > but I think elv_data should remain elevator side....
> > > I don't want to go in the wild here so if you've got suggestions, don't
> > > hesitate ;)
> > >
> >
> > cfq_queue is per-queue-per-process. io_context is just
> > per-process, so it isn't a trivial replacement.
> But I guess we can merge that stuff to have "a one way, one place" code
> rather than repeat code in all elv.
That's another pit fall, don't design for a need that isn't there. Using
io contexts in cfq does not get any easier with the code moved to
iocontext.c file, it's fine where it is.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-21 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-21 7:24 [2.6.6-mm4-ff1] I/O context isolation FabF
2004-05-21 7:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-21 7:46 ` FabF
2004-05-21 7:53 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-05-21 8:18 ` FabF
2004-05-21 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-21 8:05 ` FabF
2004-05-21 8:11 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-21 7:51 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040521075342.GP1952@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=Fabian.Frederick@skynet.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox