public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: swsusp: fix swsusp with intel-agp
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 13:41:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040521114125.GA10052@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040521112209.GA951@gondor.apana.org.au>

Hi!

> > > > > --- tmp/linux/arch/i386/mm/init.c       2004-05-20 23:08:05.000000000 +0200
> > > > > +++ linux/arch/i386/mm/init.c   2004-05-20 23:10:50.000000000 +0200
> > > > > @@ -331,6 +331,13 @@
> > > > > void zap_low_mappings (void)
> > > > > {
> > > > >        int i;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
> > > > 
> > > > Can you please define this for CONFIG_PM_DISK as well? Alternatively,
> > > > you can do the same as you did in cpu.c and define this for
> > > > CONFIG_PM.
> 
> Would you object to a patch that converted current uses of
> CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND/CONFIG_PM to a new symbol that is
> turned on iff one of CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND/CONFIG_PM_DISK
> is enabled?

I guess that open-coding #if defined() || defined() is right thing to
do for now.

Suspend2 when/if merged might not need this... This one is not really
specific to suspend-to-disk. It is specific to swsusp way of doing
things, which happens to be same as pmdisk way of doing it...
								Pavel
-- 
934a471f20d6580d5aad759bf0d97ddc

  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-21 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-21 10:07 swsusp: fix swsusp with intel-agp Pavel Machek
2004-05-21 11:05 ` Herbert Xu
2004-05-21 11:16   ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-21 11:18     ` Herbert Xu
2004-05-21 11:22       ` Herbert Xu
2004-05-21 11:41         ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2004-05-21 11:48           ` Herbert Xu
2004-05-21 11:51             ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-21 13:06           ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-05-21 13:19             ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-21 13:18               ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-05-21 13:26                 ` Herbert Xu
2004-05-21 13:22               ` Herbert Xu
2004-05-21 11:23     ` swsusp vs. pmdisk [was Re: swsusp: fix swsusp with intel-agp] Pavel Machek
2004-05-21 11:25       ` Herbert Xu
2004-05-21 11:49         ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-22  2:10   ` swsusp: fix swsusp with intel-agp Andrew Morton
2004-05-21 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-23 17:54   ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-23 20:08     ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-23 20:24       ` Pavel Machek
2004-05-23 21:27       ` Nigel Cunningham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040521114125.GA10052@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox