From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264960AbUEVMCL (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2004 08:02:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264963AbUEVMCL (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2004 08:02:11 -0400 Received: from mail.aei.ca ([206.123.6.14]:53202 "EHLO aeimail.aei.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264960AbUEVMCH (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2004 08:02:07 -0400 From: Ed Tomlinson Organization: me To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6-mm] Make i386 boot not so chatty Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 08:01:53 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Andrew Morton , Zwane Mwaikambo References: <20040520234006.291c3dfa.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040520234006.291c3dfa.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405220801.53761.edt@aei.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On May 21, 2004 02:40 am, Andrew Morton wrote: > Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > > > This patch silences the default i386 boot by putting a lot of development > > related printks under KERN_DEBUG loglevel, allowing the normal chatty mode > > to be turned on by using the 'debug' kernel parameter. > > I think I like it chatty. Turning this stuff off by default makes kernel > developers' lives that little bit harder. > > Is the `quiet' option not suitable? I have been using linux for years with an a few dips into development. I second Andrew's idea. I like the idea of a quiet parm _much_ more than a default quiet mode. Ed Tomlinson