From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S263117AbUEWPqB@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263117AbUEWPqB (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 23 May 2004 11:46:01 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263107AbUEWPqA
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 23 May 2004 11:46:00 -0400
Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:19164 "EHLO perch.kroah.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263095AbUEWPpp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 23 May 2004 11:45:45 -0400
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 08:44:54 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Ian Stirling <ian.stirling@mauve.plus.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
       Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission
Message-ID: <20040523154454.GE5750@kroah.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405222341380.18601@ppc970.osdl.org> <1085299337.2781.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <20040523152540.GA5518@kroah.com> <40B0C56A.1050701@mauve.plus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40B0C56A.1050701@mauve.plus.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 04:38:18PM +0100, Ian Stirling wrote:
> 
> Has anyone ever tried to forge the name on a patch, and get it included?

Not that I know of, but that's not the issue here.

greg k-h