From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265064AbUEYTeq (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 15:34:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265068AbUEYTeq (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 15:34:46 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:60392 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265064AbUEYTep (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 15:34:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 12:34:00 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Rodrigo Padula Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GNUPG - KERNEL Message-ID: <20040525193400.GA15799@kroah.com> References: <40B39D68.1060605@sagraluzzatto.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40B39D68.1060605@sagraluzzatto.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:24:24PM -0300, Rodrigo Padula wrote: > Hello Linus. > > It would be interesting we use GNUPG for we sign the messages in the > list of development of the kernel so that we can guarantee the > authenticity of the codes and sent messages. This has already been discussed as not a workable solution in a previous thread on Sunday. Please see the archives. thanks, greg k-h