From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265306AbUEZERG (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2004 00:17:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265309AbUEZERF (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2004 00:17:05 -0400 Received: from dci.doncaster.on.ca ([66.11.168.194]:13722 "EHLO smtp.istop.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265306AbUEZEQW (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2004 00:16:22 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" Subject: Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 00:16:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Bradley Hook , Linux-Kernel References: <40B36E0B.3090605@kssb.net> <40B395A0.2040002@timesys.com> In-Reply-To: <40B395A0.2040002@timesys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405260016.24272.phillips@arcor.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 25 May 2004 14:51, La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: > If I'm looking at a 15 year old document where do I go to find out what > "most recent published version" meant at that time? You look in the kernel version to which the patch was contributed, that should be close enough. Regards, Daniel