From: Alexey Kopytov <alexeyk@mysql.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linuxram@us.ibm.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, peter@mysql.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de
Subject: Re: Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results]
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:43:17 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405260843.17682.alexeyk@mysql.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405220113.31136.alexeyk@mysql.com>
On Saturday 22 May 2004 01:13, Alexey Kopytov wrote:
>I ran the tests with a configuration as close to yours as possible. Here are
>the results for mem=256M, 2G total file size (ext3):
>
>2.4.25:
> Time spent for test: 79.4146s
> 0.20user 16.08system 3:20.29elapsed 8%CPU
> Time spent for test: 78.9797s
> 0.11user 15.84system 3:19.76elapsed 7%CPU
>
>2.6.6-bk, AS:
> Time spent for test: 81.2208s
> 0.13user 17.97system 3:13.30elapsed 9%CPU
> Time spent for test: 82.5538s
> 0.14user 18.00system 3:14.88elapsed 9%CPU
>
>This correlates very well your results. But when I returned back to my
>original configuration (mem=640M, 3G total file size), I got the following:
>
>2.4.25:
> Time spent for test: 77.5377s
>
>2.6.6-bk, AS:
> Time spent for test: 83.1929s
>
>It seems like the smaller file size just hides the regression, but I have to
>run some more tests to ensure this.
>
The assumption appears to be true. I tried to vary the total file size and got
the following results (tests were done on another IDE disk):
2.4.27-pre3:
2 GB: 58.2707s
4 GB: 72.3313s
8 GB: 83.082s
2.6.7-rc1, AS:
2 GB: 60.6792s
4 GB: 82.8023s
8 GB: 99.4398s
Varying the number of files while keeping the total file size constant also
gives some interesting results:
2.4.27-pre3, 4 GB total file size:
1 file: 71.7288s
128 files: 72.3313s
256 files: 73.9268
2.6.7-rc1, AS, 4 GB total file size:
1 file: 76.443
128 files: 82.8023
256 files: 81.9618
--
Alexey Kopytov, Software Developer
MySQL AB, www.mysql.com
Are you MySQL certified? www.mysql.com/certification
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-26 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-02 19:57 Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-03 11:14 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-03 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-03 20:22 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-03 20:57 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-03 21:37 ` Peter Zaitsev
2004-05-03 21:50 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-03 22:01 ` Peter Zaitsev
2004-05-03 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-03 22:07 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-03 23:58 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-04 0:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 0:19 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-04 0:50 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 6:29 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 15:03 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 19:39 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 19:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 19:58 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 21:51 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 22:29 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 23:01 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-04 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-05 22:04 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-06 8:43 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-06 18:13 ` Peter Zaitsev
2004-05-06 21:49 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-06 23:49 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-07 1:29 ` Peter Zaitsev
2004-05-10 19:50 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-10 20:21 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-10 22:39 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-10 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-11 20:51 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-11 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-13 20:41 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-17 17:30 ` Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results] Ram Pai
2004-05-20 1:06 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-20 1:31 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-21 19:32 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-20 5:49 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-20 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-20 22:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-21 7:31 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-21 7:50 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-21 8:40 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-21 8:56 ` Spam: " Andrew Morton
2004-05-21 22:24 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-21 21:13 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-26 4:43 ` Alexey Kopytov [this message]
2004-05-11 22:26 ` Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 Bill Davidsen
2004-05-04 1:15 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 11:39 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-04 8:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-04 8:47 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 8:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200405260843.17682.alexeyk@mysql.com \
--to=alexeyk@mysql.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=peter@mysql.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox