public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: "Lenar Lõhmus" <lenar@vision.ee>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.x kernel sluggish behavior
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 00:46:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405270046.16429.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40B49BD6.7050202@vision.ee>

On Wed, 26 May 2004 11:29 pm, Lenar Lõhmus wrote:
> Hi.

Hello

> Overall I really like the performance and smoothness of 2.6.x kernels,

Good to hear.

> but there has been always one problematic situation.
>
> It's debian here with X/KDE running. The problem manifests itself
> when one launches acroread-plugin in Mozilla or Mozilla-based browser.

A known case.

> I think it's definetely a scheduler problem (although caused by
> application bug).

This was one of my test cases for applications designed in a certain way that 
makes them prone to priority inversion. I tried extremely hard to find a 
workaround within the kernel and failed to do so. It only manifests with the 
acroread plugin in a gecko browser on uniprocessor, and seems to be some 
interaction within some gdk library if I recall correctly. Look through the 
kernel archives for my description of an earlier version of blender that 
exhibited this same problem. I suspect it's actually the binary only acroread 
and not the gdk library at fault. My solution was to simply make all .pdf 
files launch acroread separately.

Generic solutions for tackling priority inversion prone application designs 
from within the kernel are expensive, and the best solution is to fix the 
application. No doubt a differently designed scheduler would be less prone to 
this particular interaction, but priority inversion is a "feature" of any 
dynamic priority design scheduler to some degree and it is the particular 
application that may or may not hit the resonant frequency (as I like to 
think of it) of each scheduler.

Con

      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-26 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-26 13:29 2.6.x kernel sluggish behavior Lenar Lõhmus
2004-05-26 14:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-26 16:05   ` Lenar Lõhmus
2004-05-26 14:46 ` Con Kolivas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200405270046.16429.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=lenar@vision.ee \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox