From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265275AbUE0VMw (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 17:12:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265261AbUE0VMv (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 17:12:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:45261 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265274AbUE0VMq (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2004 17:12:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 17:12:33 -0400 From: Alan Cox To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Marc-Christian Petersen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Vincent Lefevre Subject: Re: [2.4.26] overcommit_memory documentation clarification Message-ID: <20040527211233.GA357@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20040509001045.GA23263@ay.vinc17.org> <20040509214941.GG7161@ay.vinc17.org> <20040527122042.GC13095@logos.cnet> <200405271430.11125@WOLK> <20040527130925.GA13520@logos.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040527130925.GA13520@logos.cnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:09:25AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > The strict overcommit fixes need to be extraced and tested. Bero's tree has them. If you merge it it is probably good to make the small changes so it works like 2.6