From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263769AbUE1R6U (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2004 13:58:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263770AbUE1R6U (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2004 13:58:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:33431 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263769AbUE1R6S (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2004 13:58:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 19:57:24 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Jeff Garzik , "Nakajima, Jun" , Andrew Morton , Anton Blanchard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for AMD64? Message-ID: <20040528175724.GC9898@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D372001730182BAE2@scsmsx402.amr.corp.intel.com> <40B7797F.2090204@pobox.com> <17750000.1085766378@flay> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dkEUBIird37B8yKS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17750000.1085766378@flay> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --dkEUBIird37B8yKS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:46:18AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > Personally, I find the argument that it's hardware-specific control code > a much better reason for it to belong in the kernel. Is it really hardware specific ?? --dkEUBIird37B8yKS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAt32DxULwo51rQBIRAgxhAJ9Nw3O7rjbv82VnpPm6LpxYnZiHJgCbBPeb lYaByF7Sbku2v/yTNKFLRvo= =nq8X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dkEUBIird37B8yKS--