From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
bitkeeper-announce@work.bitmover.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bk-3.2.0 released
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 08:47:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040529154714.GC20605@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040529131510.GB13999@selene>
> It'll allow BK to be run on machines which have a pure 64-bit
> userspace (for example, Debian's current amd64 port), without having
> to resort to a 32-bit chroot to run the 32-bit BK binary.
OK, I found a reasonable looking box at
http://www.bzboyz.com/store/product4170.html
ASUS K8V basic, AMD 64 2800+, $346. Gotta love hardware prices.
Next question is what distro you'd prefer to be the build OS.
We typically use Red Hat, in this case that would be Fedora Core 1.
Since that was one of the first (?) distros for x86-64 there shouldn't
be any libc issues, right? What we want is to use the _oldest_ possible
distro/libc that works going forward. So is Fedora 1 OK with you? Any
nay sayers?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-29 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-18 23:32 bk-3.2.0 released Larry McVoy
2004-05-19 6:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-19 14:02 ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-19 14:11 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-05-19 14:16 ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-19 14:23 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2004-05-19 14:36 ` John Bradford
2004-05-19 18:47 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-05-19 14:26 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-05-19 14:48 ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-19 15:00 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-05-19 15:09 ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-19 16:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-05-19 20:06 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-19 21:20 ` Stan Bubrouski
2004-05-19 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-19 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-19 14:34 ` John Bradford
2004-05-19 15:41 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-05-20 3:10 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-05-29 9:54 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-05-29 13:04 ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-29 13:15 ` Hugo Mills
2004-05-29 13:20 ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-29 15:47 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2004-05-29 20:13 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2004-05-30 3:59 ` David Lang
2004-05-29 13:20 ` Vojtech Pavlik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040529154714.GC20605@work.bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=bitkeeper-announce@work.bitmover.com \
--cc=hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox