From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261405AbUE3Ohk (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 May 2004 10:37:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261943AbUE3Ohk (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 May 2004 10:37:40 -0400 Received: from zaphod.lin-gen.com ([195.64.80.164]:4002 "EHLO zaphod.dth.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261405AbUE3Ohh (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 May 2004 10:37:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 16:37:34 +0200 From: Danny ter Haar To: Adrian Bunk Cc: walt , jgarzik@pobox.com, Linux Kernel , dth@ncc1701.cistron.net, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Gigabit Kconfig problems with yesterday's update Message-ID: <20040530143734.GA24627@dth.net> References: <40B8A37D.1090802@myrealbox.com> <20040530134544.GE13111@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040530134544.GE13111@fs.tum.de> X-Message-Flag: WARNING!! You are using MS (f)outlook: Please consider upgrading to software with less bugs. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de): > @Jeff: > At a first glance, it seems the patch below that simply removes the > dependency of NET_GIGE on NET_ETHERNET would suffice. > > Is this correct or did I miss something? > > cu > Adrian > > --- linux-2.6.7-rc2-full/drivers/net/Kconfig.old 2004-05-30 15:33:24.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.7-rc2-full/drivers/net/Kconfig 2004-05-30 15:38:41.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@ > > config NET_GIGE > bool "Gigabit Ethernet (1000/10000 Mbit) controller support" > - depends on NETDEVICES && NET_ETHERNET && (PCI || SBUS) > + depends on NETDEVICES && (PCI || SBUS) > help > Gigabit ethernet. It's yummy and fast, fast, fast. Fresh source, this patch, old config from 2.6.7-rc1-bk2 and make oldconfig now works ;) Zanks Danny -- "If Microsoft had been the innovative company that it calls itself, it would have taken the opportunity to take a radical leap beyond the Mac, instead of producing a feeble, me-too implementation." - Douglas Adams -