public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
	Danny ter Haar <dth@dth.net>,
	wa1ter@myrealbox.com, dth@ncc1701.cistron.net,
	Netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Gigabit Kconfig problems with yesterday's update
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 08:32:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040531073211.GA4894@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405301302020.1632@ppc970.osdl.org>

On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:06:53PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> is it really sane these days to split out gigabit from the "regular" 
> ethernets? gigabit ethernet is getting quite a bit more common than it 
> used to be, and a lot of the gigabit devices are just "standard ethernet" 
> as far as the user is concerned, and in fact they are often _used_ in just 
> regular 10/100Mbps setups.

Or have a gige chip that's crippled to do only 10/100, like the sungem
on my ibook.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-31  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-29 14:51 Gigabit Kconfig problems with yesterday's update walt
2004-05-30 13:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-05-30 13:45 ` [patch] " Adrian Bunk
2004-05-30 14:37   ` Danny ter Haar
2004-05-30 16:41     ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-05-30 17:51       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-30 19:37         ` Adrian Bunk
2004-05-30 20:06           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-30 20:43             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-31  7:32             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-05-31 10:00               ` Paul Mackerras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040531073211.GA4894@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=dth@dth.net \
    --cc=dth@ncc1701.cistron.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=wa1ter@myrealbox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox