From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.6 synclinkmp.c
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:22:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040602222257.A9322@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1086125129.2047.21.camel@deimos.microgate.com>; from paulkf@microgate.com on Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 04:25:30PM -0500
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 04:25:30PM -0500, Paul Fulghum wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 15:57, Russell King wrote:
> > If pci_register_driver fails, the driver is not, repeat not left
> > registered. Therefore it must not be unregistered after failure
> > to register.
>
> You are right. The specific problem I was trying to
> fix is when no hardware is detected. I looked at other
> PCI drivers (char/epca.c and net/eepro100.c) and which call
> pci_unregister_driver if pci_register_driver returns <= 0
> and indicates that pci_register_device returns the number
> of pci devices detected. I now see that the two drivers I
> looked at are broken. (bad luck that)
>
> After looking at the source for pci_register_device(),
> if no devices are detected, then it still returns 1.
>
> I will rework the patches against synclink.c/synclinkmp.c
> to only call pci_unregister_device() if init fails
> (such as when no devices are detected)
> *and* the call to pci_register_device() succeeds.
Don't arrange for the driver to unload if it doesn't detect anything.
2.6 has dynid support so that the user can load your driver and assign
it extra PCI vendor/device IDs at run time - which won't work if you've
forced failure when nothing is found.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-02 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-27 17:45 Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:122 Jurjen Oskam
2004-05-27 18:19 ` Jurjen Oskam
2004-05-27 20:41 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-05-28 18:42 ` [PATCH][RFC] 2.6.6 tty_io.c hangup locking Paul Fulghum
2004-05-28 20:11 ` Jurjen Oskam
2004-05-28 20:33 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-05-28 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-29 17:45 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-01 20:51 ` [PATCH] 2.6.6 synclinkmp.c Paul Fulghum
2004-06-01 20:57 ` Russell King
2004-06-01 21:25 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-02 21:22 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-06-02 22:04 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-02 14:13 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-01 20:51 ` [PATCH] 2.6.6 synclink.c Paul Fulghum
2004-06-02 14:15 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-01 20:53 ` [PATCH] 2.6.6 synclink_cs.c Paul Fulghum
2004-06-01 21:00 ` Russell King
2004-06-01 23:04 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-13 9:05 ` [PATCH][RFC] 2.6.6 tty_io.c hangup locking Jurjen Oskam
2004-06-13 13:29 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-06-13 14:24 ` Jurjen Oskam
2004-06-13 14:39 ` Paul Fulghum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040602222257.A9322@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulkf@microgate.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox