From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@muc.de,
ashok.raj@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, jbarnes@sgi.com,
joe.korty@ccur.com, manfred@colorfullife.com,
colpatch@us.ibm.com, mikpe@csd.uu.se, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Simon.Derr@bull.net, wli@holomorphy.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 22:01:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040603220107.7590cbcc.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040603220224.73cd8d44.pj@sgi.com>
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 22:02:24 -0700
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
> The generic only is quite a bit simpler - it has some 26 fewer kernel
> source files, and it saves sparc64 some 1144 bytes of kernel text space,
> as measured by Andrew.
I bet if you do a sparc32 build, you'll get larger text size
and more leaf functions will need stack frames.
> I really don't want to go 'back' to the fancy version. If a particular
> architecture has specific additional needs, I'm certainly open to
> hearing the justifications, tradeoffs and suggestions for ways to meet
> those needs.
Another thing is that only newer gcc's are good at changing structure
accesses such that they are optimized as aggregates when possible.
You're the one doing the work, so it's up to you. :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-04 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-03 16:43 [PATCH] Bitmap and Cpumask Cleanup - Overview Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:05 ` [PATCH] cpumask 1/10 cpu_present_map real even on non-smp Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:09 ` [PATCH] cpumask 2/10 bitmap cleanup preparation for cpumask overhaul Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:09 ` [PATCH] cpumask 3/10 bitmap inlining and optimizations Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:09 ` [PATCH] cpumask 4/10 uninline find_next_bit on ia64 Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 0:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04 0:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04 2:58 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 2:47 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 2:54 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-04 5:02 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 5:01 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-06-04 1:47 ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-04 2:02 ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04 2:19 ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-04 5:18 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 5:22 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-04 6:57 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 9:31 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-04 9:37 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 9:46 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-04 9:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 11:16 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-04 11:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 11:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 16:23 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 16:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 17:47 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 18:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 18:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 18:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04 18:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05 2:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05 3:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 18:42 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 18:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05 6:48 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 2:07 ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-06 12:16 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 12:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06 12:28 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 12:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06 13:42 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 23:20 ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-07 6:44 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 9:41 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-05 7:01 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 16:03 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 16:56 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 17:29 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 17:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 19:01 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 19:08 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-06-04 19:17 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 20:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-07 7:55 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-06-05 7:28 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 8:07 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 8:16 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05 0:05 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-05 1:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05 8:04 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-05 8:26 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06 8:40 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 12:34 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-07 16:54 ` fix up compat_sched_[get/set]affinity Joe Korty
2004-06-07 17:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 5:30 ` [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 5:35 ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04 5:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04 5:53 ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04 6:47 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 4:31 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 8:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 8:43 ` Keith Owens
2004-06-04 9:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 17:08 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-09 16:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 9:14 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 6/10 remove 26 no longer used cpumask*.h files Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 7/10 remove obsolete cpumask macro uses - i386 arch Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 8/10 remove obsolete cpumask macro uses - other archs Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:11 ` [PATCH] cpumask 9/10 Remove no longer used obsolete macro emulation Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:11 ` [PATCH] cpumask 10/10 optimize various uses of new cpumasks Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 4:27 ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-04 4:40 ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04 4:51 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-09 0:09 ` PATCH] cpumask 11/10 comment, spacing tweaks Paul Jackson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-06 15:07 [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-06 16:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06 17:46 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040603220107.7590cbcc.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=joe.korty@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox