public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: mikpe@csd.uu.se, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, ak@muc.de,
	ashok.raj@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, jbarnes@sgi.com,
	joe.korty@ccur.com, manfred@colorfullife.com,
	colpatch@us.ibm.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 11:12:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040604181233.GF21007@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040604104756.472fd542.pj@sgi.com>

/* William Lee Irwin III:
>> I'm thoroughly disgusted.

On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 10:47:56AM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Yup ... LOL.  One sick piece of code.
> I didn't return the actual return from sched_getaffinity() because (1)
> it's ok to estimate the mask size too high, and (2) given that the man
> page and kernel don't agree on the return value of sched_getaffinity(),
> I figured that the less I relied on it, the longer my user code would
> continue functioning in a useful manner.  As always, the key to robust
> code (code that withstands the perils of time) is minimizing risky
> assumptions.

Even the following returns 32 on UP. _SC_NPROCESSOR_CONF is
unimplementable. NR_CPUS serves as an upper bound on the number of cpus
that may at some time be simultaneously present in the future. Without
any way to reliably determine this, luserspace is fscked.

*/


#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>

static int getaffinity(pid_t, size_t, unsigned long *);
static int detect_nr_cpus(void);

int main(void)
{
	printf("%d\n", detect_nr_cpus());
	return 0;
}

static int detect_nr_cpus(void)
{
	unsigned long *cpus = malloc(sizeof(long));
	size_t upper, middle, lower = sizeof(long);

	for (upper = lower; getaffinity(0, upper, cpus) < 0; upper *= 2) {
		if (!realloc(cpus, 2*upper))
			return -ENOMEM;
	}
	while (lower < upper) {
		middle = (lower + upper)/2;
		if (!realloc(cpus, middle))
			return -ENOMEM;
		if (getaffinity(0, middle, cpus) < 0)
			lower = middle;
		else
			upper = middle;
	}
	return CHAR_BIT*upper;
}

static int getaffinity(pid_t pid, size_t size, unsigned long *cpus)
{
	return syscall(__NR_sched_getaffinity, pid, size, cpus);
}

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-04 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-03 16:43 [PATCH] Bitmap and Cpumask Cleanup - Overview Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:05 ` [PATCH] cpumask 1/10 cpu_present_map real even on non-smp Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:09 ` [PATCH] cpumask 2/10 bitmap cleanup preparation for cpumask overhaul Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:09 ` [PATCH] cpumask 3/10 bitmap inlining and optimizations Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:09 ` [PATCH] cpumask 4/10 uninline find_next_bit on ia64 Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  0:07   ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04  0:25     ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04  2:58       ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  2:47     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  2:54       ` David S. Miller
2004-06-04  5:02         ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  5:01           ` David S. Miller
2004-06-04  1:47   ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-04  2:02     ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04  2:19       ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-04  5:18       ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  5:22         ` David S. Miller
2004-06-04  6:57           ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  9:31         ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-04  9:37           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04  9:46             ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-04  9:59               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 11:16                 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-04 11:27                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 11:32                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 16:23                       ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 16:28                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 17:47                           ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 18:12                             ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-06-04 18:20                               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 18:27                               ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04 18:38                                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05  2:51                                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05  3:29                                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 18:42                               ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 18:42                                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05  6:48                                   ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06  2:07                               ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-06 12:16                                 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 12:13                                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06 12:28                                     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 12:36                                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06 13:42                                         ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 23:20                                   ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-07  6:44                                     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  9:41           ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-05  7:01             ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 16:03           ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 16:56             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 17:29               ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 17:52                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 19:01                   ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 19:08               ` Anton Blanchard
2004-06-04 19:17                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 20:28                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-07  7:55                   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-06-05  7:28                 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06  8:07                   ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06  8:16                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05  0:05               ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-05  1:31                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05  8:04                   ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-05  8:26                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06  8:40                       ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 12:34                         ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-07 16:54                       ` fix up compat_sched_[get/set]affinity Joe Korty
2004-06-07 17:07                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04  5:30       ` [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  5:35         ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04  5:40           ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04  5:53             ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04  6:47             ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  4:31     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  8:19   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04  8:43     ` Keith Owens
2004-06-04  9:54       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 17:08         ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-09 16:38         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04  9:14     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 6/10 remove 26 no longer used cpumask*.h files Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 7/10 remove obsolete cpumask macro uses - i386 arch Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 8/10 remove obsolete cpumask macro uses - other archs Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:11 ` [PATCH] cpumask 9/10 Remove no longer used obsolete macro emulation Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:11 ` [PATCH] cpumask 10/10 optimize various uses of new cpumasks Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  4:27   ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-04  4:40     ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04  4:51     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-09  0:09   ` PATCH] cpumask 11/10 comment, spacing tweaks Paul Jackson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-06 15:07 [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-06 16:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06 17:46   ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040604181233.GF21007@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
    --cc=joe.korty@ccur.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox