From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use numa policy API for boot time policy
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 04:18:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040605041813.75e2d22d.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40C12865.9050803@colorfullife.com>
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 03:56:53 +0200
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> >Suggested by Manfred Spraul.
> >
> >__get_free_pages had a hack to do node interleaving allocation at boot time.
> >This patch sets an interleave process policy using the NUMA API for init
> >and the idle threads instead. Before entering the user space init the policy
> >is reset to default again. Result is the same.
> >
> >Advantage is less code and removing of a check from a fast path.
> >
> >Removes more code than it adds.
> >
> >I verified that the memory distribution after boot is roughly the same.
> >
> >
> >
> Does it work for order != 0 allocations? It's important that the big
> hash tables do not end up all in node 0. AFAICS alloc_pages_current()
> calls interleave_nodes() only for order==0 allocs.
That's correct. It will only work for order 0 allocations.
But it sounds quite bogus anyways to move the complete hash tables
to another node anyways. It would probably be better to use vmalloc()
and a interleaving mapping for it. Then you would get the NUMA bandwidth
benefit even for accessing single tables.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-05 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-05 1:43 [PATCH] Use numa policy API for boot time policy Andi Kleen
2004-06-05 1:56 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-06-05 2:18 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-06-05 2:32 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-06-05 10:22 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-05 10:48 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-09 15:44 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-06-09 15:56 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-09 16:12 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-06-05 10:20 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-06-05 10:33 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040605041813.75e2d22d.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox