Re: Using getpid() often, another way? [was Re: clone() <-> getpid() bug in 2.6?]

Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-07T13:12:07Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 456 bytes --]

On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 08:09:17PM -0400, Russell Leighton wrote:
> >a library using clone sounds suspect to me, I can't imagine an app using
> >pthreads being able to just use your library as a result.
> >
> Why? In what way would a program that uses pthreads interfere with
> threads created using clone()?

you do all kinds of tricks behind the threading library's back, and share
some stuff while not others. I'd be suprised of that would NOT break.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]