From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [3/12] remove irda usage of isa_virt_to_bus()
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 02:12:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040615091219.GR1444@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040615014344.GA17657@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 06:43:44PM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> Could you please send this directly to me. I hate scrubbing
> large patches from the mailing list archive.
> Note that before even thinking of pushing this patch in the
> kernel, we need to perform testing with the hardware on i386 and
> potentially on ARM. The author only tried with irtty that doesn't use
> this function, so that's not a valid test at all. Finding people test
> those changes is going to be tough, as usual.
> I'm also wondering about the validity of those changes, but
> that's another matter I need to go through. During 2.5.X, some people
> assured me that using isa_virt_to_bus was safe on all platform with an
> ISA bus...
Okay, well, I myself didn't produce this, and I couldn't tell offhand
if it was bogus or not. I presumed bugreporter made happy and spraying
it across the debian userbase was enough to verify it at runtime. From
what you're telling me, this is not the case.
Can you recommend people to do this kind of testing?
Apparently people aren't entirely happy with "dump it on lkml and wait
for an ack or nak", which I've noted for future reference, but probably
won't have a need to consider again (it's very rare that I have to deal
with changes I didn't write myself or are otherwise in areas I don't
have much knowledge about). OTOH, it was easier to find than buried in
a distro BTS and/or cvs, not that that makes it ideal.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-15 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-15 1:43 [3/12] remove irda usage of isa_virt_to_bus() Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-15 9:12 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-06-15 17:01 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-15 17:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-14 0:31 [0/12] Debian bugfixes William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-14 0:33 ` [1/12] don't dereference netdev->name before register_netdev() William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-14 0:34 ` [2/12] lower priority of "too many keys" msg in atkbd.c William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-14 0:36 ` [3/12] remove irda usage of isa_virt_to_bus() William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-14 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040615091219.GR1444@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox