From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266240AbUFPLJ6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:09:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266241AbUFPLJ6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:09:58 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:15082 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266240AbUFPLJy (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:09:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:00:51 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: remove duplicate COMPATIBLE_IOCTL lines Message-Id: <20040616130051.7b8fe3e1.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200406111510.37981.arnd@arndb.de> References: <200406111510.37981.arnd@arndb.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:10:37 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Some of the ioctl numbers in ia32_ioctl are already defined in > include/linux/compat_ioctl.h, so they can be removed here. > Maybe we should have a runtime check for duplicate numbers? > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Thanks. Your patch was corrupted somehow, but I applied it by hand. -Andi