From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Further aacraid work
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 18:06:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040616220607.GA6451@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040616215834.GA21072@infradead.org>
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:58:34PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Yikes. This looked like they usual use 32bit dma descriptors if not
> enough memory hacks to me. If aacraid is that royally fucked we should
> probably add CONFIG_X86 to it.
Its working on x86-32, x86-64 and I believe (Mark can confirm this) IA-64.
I'm fairly sure there are some platforms that aren't going to fit the
hardware's view of the world which seems to be
0[DMAable area..................]defined limit [4Gb+.. PAE mode on some]
The later cards also have a 2Gb limit for the ring buffers, but not for the
I/O you want to target
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-16 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-16 21:04 PATCH: Further aacraid work Alan Cox
2004-06-16 21:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-16 21:40 ` Alan Cox
2004-06-16 21:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-16 21:48 ` Alan Cox
2004-06-16 21:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-16 22:06 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-06-29 17:48 ` Byron Stanoszek
2004-06-29 18:27 ` Mark Haverkamp
2004-06-29 18:37 ` Alan Cox
2004-06-30 2:02 ` bm
2004-06-30 16:07 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-17 12:53 Salyzyn, Mark
2004-06-17 13:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-06-17 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-17 13:55 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-17 13:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-17 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2004-06-17 14:39 Salyzyn, Mark
2004-06-17 14:55 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-17 14:58 ` Alan Cox
2004-06-17 15:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-17 19:16 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-17 16:32 ` Clay Haapala
2004-06-17 16:37 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-17 16:46 ` Alan Cox
2004-06-17 15:11 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-06-17 17:54 Salyzyn, Mark
2004-06-17 20:38 ` Alan Cox
2004-06-17 20:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-17 20:56 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 15:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-18 20:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-27 17:33 ` James Bottomley
[not found] <286GI-5y3-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <286Qp-5EU-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-06-17 19:10 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-17 20:54 ` Alan Cox
2004-06-17 21:13 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-17 21:25 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-18 15:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-06-18 5:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-18 14:07 ` James Bottomley
2004-06-18 15:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-06-18 20:53 Salyzyn, Mark
2004-06-28 13:17 Salyzyn, Mark
2004-06-29 18:53 Salyzyn, Mark
2004-06-29 19:03 ` Byron Stanoszek
2004-06-29 19:27 Salyzyn, Mark
2004-06-29 20:20 ` Byron Stanoszek
2004-06-29 20:42 ` Alan Cox
2004-06-29 20:55 Salyzyn, Mark
2004-06-29 23:22 ` Byron Stanoszek
2004-06-30 19:52 ` Byron Stanoszek
2004-06-30 19:59 ` Dario
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040616220607.GA6451@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox