From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265045AbUFRL0j (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2004 07:26:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265115AbUFRL0j (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2004 07:26:39 -0400 Received: from delerium.kernelslacker.org ([81.187.208.145]:33671 "EHLO delerium.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265045AbUFRL0i (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2004 07:26:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:25:49 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: water modem , davej@codemonkey.org.uk, lkml , akpm Subject: Re: [PATCH] undefined reference to `acpi_processor_register_performance Message-ID: <20040618112549.GF16097@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , "Randy.Dunlap" , water modem , lkml , akpm References: <40D20080.9040909@ameritech.net> <20040617201243.4ebfc9b2.rddunlap@osdl.org> <40D26DD5.60809@ameritech.net> <20040617215812.105c67d0.rddunlap@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040617215812.105c67d0.rddunlap@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:58:12PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > Several CPU_FREQ options need ACPI_PROCESSOR interfaces > to build. Hmm, it should be optional. Ie, if you don't have ACPI enabled, you should still be able to use these drivers (the k7 one at least), you just won't be able to use the ACPI fallback. Dave