From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.7-bk way too fast
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:02:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040621110214.GA1721@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1087813570.1691.7.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:26:10PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > > Something is definitely screwy with the latest -bk. I updated from a
> > > kernel ~1 week ago, and all timer-related stuff is moving at a vastly
> > > increased rate. My guess is twice as fast. Most annoying is the system
> > > clock advances at twice normal rate, and keyboard repeat is so sensitive
> > > I am spending quite a bit of time typing this message, what with having
> > > to delettte (<== example) extra characters. Double-clicking is also
> > > broken :(
> >
> > Q: Are you using the atkbd.softrepeat=1 parameter? Or an USB keyboard?
> > If not, you shouldn't be getting faster repeats even if the timer
> > were off, because the repat shoul be generated by the keyboard
> > itself.
>
> I'm using a PS/2 Microsoft Natural Keyboard Elite and I see the faster
> typing rates only while in X. However, keyboard rate is normal while in
> a text console.
It's possible that X does it's own autorepeat, though that'd rather
surprise me.
Can you check with showkey -s, and xev in X?
--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs, SuSE CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-21 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-21 2:54 2.6.7-bk way too fast Jeff Garzik
2004-06-21 3:29 ` Ricky Beam
2004-06-21 7:20 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-21 8:23 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-07-02 7:53 ` David Woodhouse
2004-07-02 12:56 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-06-21 3:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-21 3:49 ` Matt H.
2004-06-21 11:53 ` Marcel Holtmann
2004-06-21 3:52 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-06-21 3:55 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-06-21 4:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-21 5:00 ` Norberto Bensa
2004-06-21 5:39 ` Norberto Bensa
2004-06-21 6:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-21 7:05 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-21 7:18 ` Matt H.
2004-06-21 7:16 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-21 8:15 ` Matt H.
2004-06-21 8:20 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-21 9:25 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-06-21 10:24 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-21 7:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-21 9:52 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-06-21 16:41 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-06-21 7:19 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-06-21 5:11 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-21 5:08 ` Aubin LaBrosse
2004-06-21 8:22 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-06-21 10:26 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-21 11:02 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2004-06-21 8:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-21 9:17 ` Matt H.
2004-06-21 9:56 ` Jeff Sipek
2004-06-21 10:47 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-21 16:55 ` Norberto Bensa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-21 13:20 Sau Dan Lee
2004-06-21 15:17 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-06-21 15:25 ` Sau Dan Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040621110214.GA1721@ucw.cz \
--to=vojtech@suse.cz \
--cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox