From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262873AbUFWX6Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:58:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263001AbUFWX6Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:58:24 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:31937 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262873AbUFWX6X (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:58:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:55:38 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: jeremy.katz@gmail.com, akpm@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, katzj@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC64 iSeries viodasd proc file Message-ID: <20040623235538.GA22791@kroah.com> References: <200406232354.i5NNsnCL029470@supreme.pcug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406232354.i5NNsnCL029470@supreme.pcug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:54:49AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > From: Greg KH > > > > I agree, I don't think that many things have disappeared from /proc just > > yet, right? You should just have more information than what you > > previously did, right? Or did scsi drop their /proc support fully? > > What started this discussion is that I had to drop all the proc support > from the iSeries virtual devices while attempting to get the drivers > into the mainline kernel. Ok, but that support was never in mainline, right? :) Yeah I know, distro trees... greg k-h