From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Terence Ripperda <tripperda@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
discuss@x86-64.org, tiwai@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
andrea@suse.de
Subject: Re: 32-bit dma allocations on 64-bit platforms
Date: 24 Jun 2004 20:51:56 +0200
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:51:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040624185156.GA19559@colin2.muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040624154429.GC8014@hygelac>
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:44:29AM -0500, Terence Ripperda wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 04:46:44PM -0700, ak@muc.de wrote:
> > pci_alloc_consistent is limited to 16MB, but so far nobody has really
> > complained about that. If that should be a real issue we can make
> > it allocate from the swiotlb pool, which is usually 64MB (and can
> > be made bigger at boot time)
>
> In all of the cases I've seen, it defaults to 4M. in swiotlb.c,
> io_tlb_nslabs defaults to 1024, * PAGE_SIZE == 4194304.
I checked this now.
It's
#define IO_TLB_SHIFT 11
static unsigned long io_tlb_nslabs = 1024;
and the allocation does
io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(io_tlb_nslabs * (1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT));
which contrary to its name does not allocate in pages (otherwise you would
get 8GB of memory on x86-64 and even more on IA64)
That's definitely far too small.
A better IO_TLB_SHIFT would be 16 or 17.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-24 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <m3acyu6pwd.fsf@averell.firstfloor.org>
[not found] ` <20040623213643.GB32456@hygelac>
2004-06-23 23:46 ` 32-bit dma allocations on 64-bit platforms Andi Kleen
2004-06-24 11:13 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-24 11:29 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2004-06-24 14:36 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-24 14:42 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-24 14:58 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-24 15:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 15:48 ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-24 16:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 16:56 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 17:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 17:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 18:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 18:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 18:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 18:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-24 22:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 22:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 22:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-24 23:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-25 6:16 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-25 2:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-25 2:47 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-25 3:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-24 23:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-25 1:17 ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-25 3:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 22:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-24 23:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 22:37 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 22:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 23:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 23:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 17:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 17:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 18:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 18:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-24 16:04 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-24 17:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 18:33 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-24 18:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-25 15:50 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-25 17:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-25 17:39 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-25 17:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 14:45 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-06-24 15:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 15:44 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-06-24 16:15 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2004-06-24 17:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-24 22:28 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-06-24 18:51 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-06-26 4:58 ` David Mosberger
[not found] <2akPm-16l-65@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-06-23 21:46 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-24 6:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-24 10:33 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-24 13:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-24 14:39 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-06-23 18:35 Terence Ripperda
2004-06-23 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-26 5:05 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-26 7:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-29 6:13 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-29 6:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-30 8:00 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-06-26 5:02 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040624185156.GA19559@colin2.muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=tripperda@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox