From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266827AbUFYSDX (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:03:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266830AbUFYSDV (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:03:21 -0400 Received: from 64-60-248-69.cust.telepacific.net ([64.60.248.69]:48695 "EHLO mx.rackable.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266828AbUFYSCe (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:02:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 11:02:44 -0700 From: Joshua Kwan To: Neil Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [HELP] Tracking down a MD bug Message-ID: <20040625180244.GA8009@mx.rackable.com> Mail-Followup-To: Joshua Kwan , Neil Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <16603.19400.833911.26478@cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16603.19400.833911.26478@cse.unsw.edu.au> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2004 18:02:00.0120 (UTC) FILETIME=[830E2B80:01C45ADE] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 07:46:48AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote: > > Are there any MD code changes that could have caused this so I can point > > SuSE somewhere? (Well, then again, many SuSE folks are on this list > > anyway...) >=20 > This is definitely a bug in the Suse 2.6.4-52 kernels, and I'm pretty > sure they have fixed it. Thanks, I upgraded the box to 2.6.5-7.75-smp and the bug has vanished. --=20 Joshua Kwan --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBQNxoxKOILr94RG8mAQJ8vg/+LhyHHn+3wZMsbQLY64gyiybdLSzB8YDr 1Qh1HikcDeeed7LoNvE7vfhaMODs9axcZFPib6JM4ABXokQUAfwq5SlWzxvSrEUT J4v3Jb9mdoP3PDlztl/GIkoavCVe8+ri6cj2LQXgb2yaIYLneE+d0RWxxpINibnx rlxZK2US3mRTMUG5rCp1JhaszfWa8DgRDDqsmfch9RzaGvsCX6PILfmQIxNRT47h PFUsxnboHPzAuRm4OyV9jgdAyDzwlaGi4R/wOuZ8fiaxCNTQ+YuSGUAck237OBWz 7mubbm1bSCdRP/8UIiYS9I+9uFjfnhyp/q+yhCf4THy2T0K1XgGyWvQ64h29CxIu /a9krpnx/J9LDGv4/AHzrBPdVHzuU8IcATYmIF3kZ0+0YX4JDTV/jQEZHr4y7Yhh f0LteOpBGofWeIHQP0uYS93WSD1AcNpnW0CrpuljX9PPFgjsT8ALP0QIr60/te3k yuelToD+dR92iDGoBhFfR2q+DoPjKwkdnHuYDZouaq3YgBkNAnq4QDkWSLkHKOGd 43I0tKxIzVXKEpSEQOjvNJ56JlUT8n8PwWq/yS5s84GmUkeDO3/sJ0Zx0yF8ucwo 3+mE+BGIAW++bcGYiBvhJ573MDqsrag2MMfNpuP885xEjNXaFTKJykZCfP7J01qX S1FdaLmVlWc= =mpSt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wac7ysb48OaltWcw--