public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staircase scheduler v7.4
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:46:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200406251846.46286.mbuesch@freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406251840.46577.mbuesch@freenet.de>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 25 June 2004 18:40, you wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just applied the patch against 2.6.7-bk7 and saw
> the following strange thing:
> 
> I was compiling some program, as suddenly compilation
> stopped. g++ was running (sorry, I didn't look at the
> process state. Maybe it was in T or something like that),
> but it didn't get any timeslice. (so didn't execute. Simply
> stayed around and didn't finish).
> I noticed this since I switched from staircase 7.1 to 7.4
> a few minutes ago. No such problems before.
> I'm not really sure, if it's a staircase problem. Just
> wanted to let you know.

Oh, forgot to say, that load was quite a bit too high.
It was aprox 6.0, but should have been 2.0 (or at absolute
maximum 3.0), as there were not so many running processes.
There was the g++ at nice 0, some process running at nice 19 and
tvtime at nice 0. All other processes were not taking much CPU
and sleeping most of the time. (X and KDE was running, but
I don't think they can cause this load.)

- -- 
Regards Michael Buesch  [ http://www.tuxsoft.de.vu ]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA3FbzFGK1OIvVOP4RAlgbAJ9eOW2vI/8vv6ZGPDWe6ZmGMW2Y2QCfVN64
DuRJpB+G9FSrenG/rlWA8zo=
=YH0g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-06-25 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-25 16:40 [PATCH] Staircase scheduler v7.4 Michael Buesch
2004-06-25 16:46 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 18:44   ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-25 19:05     ` Willy Tarreau
2004-06-25 19:48       ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26  1:11         ` kernel
2004-06-26 16:33           ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26 17:29           ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27  9:14             ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 19:17             ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-27 19:28               ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27 21:55                 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28  0:15                   ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28  8:40                     ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28  8:49                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-28 11:53                         ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28 12:11                           ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28 15:03                             ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-06-28 15:19                               ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28 15:39                                 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-06-28 17:11                             ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-29  4:36                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-28 23:21                         ` Peter Williams
2004-06-29  4:44                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-29  6:01                             ` Ed Sweetman
2004-06-29  6:55                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-26  2:05         ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 10:24         ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 10:27           ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 23:50             ` Peter Williams
2004-06-27 12:00         ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 12:04           ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 12:54             ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27 13:15               ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 16:46 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-25 14:38 Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 18:32 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-26  1:28   ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 22:20 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-06-26  1:05   ` kernel
2004-06-26 20:04 ` Wes Janzen
2004-06-26 20:11   ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26 21:14     ` Wes Janzen
2004-06-26 21:38       ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-06-27  9:16   ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 11:40     ` Grzegorz Kulewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200406251846.46286.mbuesch@freenet.de \
    --to=mbuesch@freenet.de \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox