public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>
To: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
Cc: kernel@kolivas.org,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staircase scheduler v7.4
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:28:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200406272128.57367.mbuesch@freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1088363821.1698.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Quoting Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>:
> On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 19:29 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> 
> > Now another "problem":
> > Maybe it's because I'm tired, but it seems like
> > your fix-patch made moving windows in X11 is less smooth.
> > I wanted to mention it, just in case there's some other
> > person, who sees this behaviour, too. In case I'm the
> > only one seeing it, you may forget it. ;)
> 
> I can see the same with 7.4-1 (that's 2.6.7-ck2 plus the fix-patch): X11
> feels sluggish while moving windows around. Simply by loading a Web page
> into Konqueror and dragging Evolution over it, makes me able to
> reproduce this problem.
> 
> Doing the same on 2.6.7-mm3 is totally smooth, however.

I think staircase-7.7 fixed this, too. (for me).
Have a try.

- -- 
Regards Michael Buesch  [ http://www.tuxsoft.de.vu ]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA3x/2FGK1OIvVOP4RAnxTAJ9NUM6V1bccFgAauHx6sV6+80DjLQCg1hE8
c2krr3+fW/notHs8mc8it48=
=OQoZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-27 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-25 16:40 [PATCH] Staircase scheduler v7.4 Michael Buesch
2004-06-25 16:46 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 18:44   ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-25 19:05     ` Willy Tarreau
2004-06-25 19:48       ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26  1:11         ` kernel
2004-06-26 16:33           ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26 17:29           ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27  9:14             ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 19:17             ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-27 19:28               ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2004-06-27 21:55                 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28  0:15                   ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28  8:40                     ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28  8:49                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-28 11:53                         ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28 12:11                           ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28 15:03                             ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-06-28 15:19                               ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28 15:39                                 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-06-28 17:11                             ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-29  4:36                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-28 23:21                         ` Peter Williams
2004-06-29  4:44                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-29  6:01                             ` Ed Sweetman
2004-06-29  6:55                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-26  2:05         ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 10:24         ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 10:27           ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 23:50             ` Peter Williams
2004-06-27 12:00         ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 12:04           ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 12:54             ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27 13:15               ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 16:46 ` Michael Buesch
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-25 14:38 Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 18:32 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-26  1:28   ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 22:20 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-06-26  1:05   ` kernel
2004-06-26 20:04 ` Wes Janzen
2004-06-26 20:11   ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26 21:14     ` Wes Janzen
2004-06-26 21:38       ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-06-27  9:16   ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 11:40     ` Grzegorz Kulewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200406272128.57367.mbuesch@freenet.de \
    --to=mbuesch@freenet.de \
    --cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@w.ods.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox