From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: debi.janos@freemail.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.7-mm1 - 2.6.7-mm4 weird http behavior
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:59:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040629135922.12384153.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040629133501.3c2cd2a2@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:35:01 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> wrote:
> FYI - gentoo works for window scale 0..2 and appears to fail for >3.
>
> Also, the socket ends up with:
>
> State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
> ESTAB 0 0 172.20.1.73:34452 198.63.211.232:http
> ts sack wscale:0,3 rto:332 rtt:66.375/50.5 cwnd:3
Yes, I've seen this declared in other reports too.
It probably means just that for window scales of 0..2 the misinterpretation
does not result in a too-small-to-send-data window.
But I'm still confused that the scaled window is being given to the
receiver, and this makes the connection freeze. I wonder if there is
a queer box doing NAT or similar in front of the gentoo machine which
either:
1) Applies any window scaling to both directions
2) Applies window scaling to the wrong direction
and uses this to "help" with dropping of out-of-window TCP segments.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-29 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-29 13:20 2.6.7-mm1 - 2.6.7-mm4 weird http behavior Debi Janos
2004-06-29 15:45 ` bert hubert
2004-06-29 16:57 ` Debi Janos
2004-06-29 17:28 ` bert hubert
[not found] ` <freemail.20040529200446.32881@fm2.freemail.hu>
2004-06-29 18:38 ` bert hubert
2004-06-29 18:47 ` Debi Janos
2004-06-29 22:46 ` Redeeman
2004-06-29 17:27 ` Jesse Stockall
2004-06-29 17:39 ` FabF
2004-06-29 18:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-29 18:50 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-29 19:07 ` Debi Janos
2004-06-29 19:13 ` Jesse Stockall
2004-06-29 19:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-29 19:54 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-29 20:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-29 20:59 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-06-29 21:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-29 21:36 ` John Heffner
2004-06-29 21:53 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-29 21:58 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-30 8:04 ` Debi Janos
2004-06-30 8:04 ` Debi Janos
2004-06-30 20:14 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-30 20:20 ` John Heffner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-29 18:40 Debi Janos
2004-06-29 22:39 ` Redeeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040629135922.12384153.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=debi.janos@freemail.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox