From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Do x86 NX and AMD prefetch check cause page fault infinite loop?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:50:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040630055041.GA16320@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040630013824.GA24665@mail.shareable.org>
* Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> wrote:
> But... what if the page is not executable? When NX is enabled on
> 32-bit x86, and all x86-64 kernels, or even the exec-shield patch's
> changes to the USER_CS limit (that limit isn't checked in
> __is_prefetch) - those conditions all allow __is_prefetch() to read a
> prefetch instruction, cause the fault handler to return, and repeat.
>
> This can only happen when something branches to a page with PROT_EXEC
> _not_ set, on a kernel which honours that, and the target address is a
> prefetch instruction.
>
> That can happen due to malicious code, a programming error, or
> corruption.
>
> The behaviour in such cases _should_ be SIGSEGV due to lack of execute
> permission. However, I think the behaviour will be an infinite loop.
>
> I haven't tested this as I don't have the hardware for NX, and don't
> want to apply the non-NX exec-shield or PaX patches on a working
> Athlon box.
>
> Can anyone confirm this is a real bug, or that it isn't and I missed
> the reason why not?
i understand what you mean, but for this to trigger one would have to
trigger the prefetch erratum _and_ then turn off executability in
parallel, right? So the question is, is there a reliable way to trigger
the pagefault situation, and if yes, how do you turn on NX - because
right before the fault the instruction had to be executable.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-30 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-30 1:38 Do x86 NX and AMD prefetch check cause page fault infinite loop? Jamie Lokier
2004-06-30 5:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-06-30 14:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-30 14:38 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-01 1:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-01 6:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-01 15:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-07-02 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-07-02 8:50 ` [patch] i386 nx prefetch fix & cleanups, 2.6.7-mm5 Ingo Molnar
2004-06-30 6:10 ` Do x86 NX and AMD prefetch check cause page fault infinite loop? Denis Vlasenko
2004-06-30 14:23 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040630055041.GA16320@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox